Goad, P. "Competition and Circumstance: Urban legacies of the olympics"
Tim Blackie

Phillip Goad's work is a study of the effect of the Olympic games on the urban form of the two cities that hosted them, Melbourne in 1956 and Sydney in 2000. These two different Olympics were world apart, and strong contrast can be seen.

The Melbourne Olympics were cobbled together post-war, and mostly utilised existing buildings and facilities in the end due to the failure of organisation and lack of funding. As a result, fortunately much older architecture was not lost. Things were stretched to the extent that shooting was held at Williamstown with the cars in the carpark as seating, rowing was held t Ballarrat, and equestrian events at South Africa due to Australia's draconian quarantine laws.

Most of the few new sporting facilities were located at Olympic Park, and these facilities were placed haphazardly but have served Melbourne well since. An edict by Melbourne City Council in 1954 forced the removal of verandahs from buildings in time for the olympics, and this attempt to modernise has left much fine architecture harmed by it.

Design of one of the few new buildings, the Olympic swimming stadium, was won by a team of young architects in a competition. This building not only kick started their careers, but also was the first major use of experimental architecture in Olympic buildings, ad could be claimed to have started the legacy of more inventive Olympic architecture world-wide.

In Sydney by comparison, one major criticism could be aimed at the architecture. There was no design competitions, but rather the construction of the Olympic buildings was won by competitive tendering to build for the lowest price, in line with the currently dominant practices of economic rationalism. As a result, the buildings are all structurally competent, on budget, and house corporate seating arrangements and TV coverage well, but there is little of architectural interest or importance.

Further contrasts can be drawn with the artwork and advertising. In Melbourne, there was no formal art budget, and very little public work was present or created. There was an art exhibition around the same time, but most of the Olympic artwork was decorating retail businesses. Myer's Christmas windows originated at this time and wall art was present elsewhere. Asides from this, there was a huge Olympic torch with a one metre high gas fuelled flame erected over a city street and later removed, and a few very minor works. In contrast, Sydney invested a significant budget into the development of contemporary artworks around the area, and very heavily promoted the event.

For Olympic village accommodation, Melbourne's use of the development of West Heidelberg housing commission estate turned out to be a disaster, as not only was it far from the events but it was far from shops and services and became one of Victoria's worst suburbs in the years after. In Sydney, the Olympic village was built as townhouses suitable to be sold off to the middle class after the event, and these buildings served competently. There are now supporting a rise in denser housing development in the area.

In terms of infrastructure, the Olympics would seem to have been of benefit to both cities, as the sudden need forced infrastructure to be developed that would serve the cities well for following decades. Melbournes trams and trains especially around the MCG were upgraded, and Sydneys Olympic development was made to utilise public transport which will make it operate well into the future, along with other upgrades such as to the airport.

In the conclusion, the Olympics cause a sudden pressure on the city, which is good for forcing new infrastructure projects, but can also be dangerous in the haphazard way the urban form is changed in a race for the event. There are both benefits and losses and it can be very, very different between different olympics at different points in time.

Reference:

Goad, P. 2001, "Competition and Circumstance: Urban Legacies of the Olympics", Debating the City: An Anthology, ed. Barrett, J., Butler-Bowdon, C., Historic Houses Trust of New South Wales, Sydney, ch.11 (21p)

12. City Futures 24th May, 2008 02:43:47   [#] 

Comments

Archive

September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008

Recent Comments

Hype and Hope
      Sun`
Cities and Creative Class
      Sun`
Deodhar, V. 2004 “Does th
      long nguyen
Glaeser, E. 2004, "Review
      Sam Finch
Dovey, K. 2005 "Hype and
      LONG, Alistair
Glaeser, E. 2004, "Review
      will
Davies, L. 2005, "Not in
      DM
Creative Class
      Alistair
Florida, R. 2005 "Cities
      nf, LONGGGGG
Low, S. 2006, `How Privat
      LN
Dovey, K. 2005 "Hype and
      LONGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG,
      Duelling McClassy, NF, Kelly
Lewis, M. 1999, “The Spur
      will
Taylor, B. 2004, "The Geo
      will
Stretton, H. 1975, "Inter
      Edward Crossland
Lewis, M. 1999, “The Spur
      Edward Croslsand

Melbourne

Civil Pandemonium
Melbourne 2030 Portal
Melbourne on Transit
Save Our Suburbs
Sustainable Melbourne
Urban Creature

Cities

SevenSixFive
The Next American City
Andrew Blum
Architecture and Morality
Bright Lights Dim Beauty
       of Chicago

Burb
City Comforts
The City Desk
City States
Cyburbia
Diamond Geezer
Forum for Urban Design
Me, My Life +
       Infrastructure

Progressive Reactionary
Rebuilding Place in the
       Urban Space

Smogr
Urban Cartography
Urban Commons
Urban Planning Research
Where

Design and Development

A Daily Dose of
        Architecture

Artect.net
Beyond Brilliance,
       Beyond Stupidity

Brand Avenue
Bricoleurbanism
CoolTown Studios
City of Sound
Curbed [LA] [SF]
Gabion
The Ground Floor
Ksmgrd
Lebbeus Woods
The Measures Taken
Megablog
New (Sub)Urbanism
Private Sector
       Development Blog

Reason Commentaries
Richard Green Sit Down Man, You're
       a Bloody Tragedy

Tropolism
Urban Planning Blog
Veritas et Venustas
Wow Flutter

Culture and Theory

2 Blowhards
Abstract Dynamics
Aesthetic Grounds
Anne Galloway
Barista
James Howard Kunstler
Junk for Code
Karrie Jacobs
Life Without Buildings
Martin Krieger
Neighbourhoods
Neighbourhoods.org
Place Space
Rodcorp
Rough Theory
The Sesquipedalist
Side Effects
Space and Culture
Strange Harvest

Environments

a456
Blog Like You Give a Damn
The Commons Blog
Environmental and
       Urban Economics

Environmental Economics
Gristmill
Impact Analysis
Jetson Green
Landscape and Urbanism
Muck and Mystery
Oikos
The Perfect City
Pruned
Web Urbanist
World Changing

Transport

cfsmtb in low
       earth orbit

Live from the Third Rail
metro(spo--ka(n')
Peter Gordon's Blog
Streets Blog
Train Blog
The Transportationist

Economics

Agoraphilia
The Becker-Posner Blog
Knowledge Problem
Marginal Revolution

Non Blogs

Planetizen
Planners Web
Project for Public
       Spaces

New Urbanism
American Planning
       Association

Spacing
Polar inertia
Sustainable
       Communities

Australian Policy
       Online

Cyburbia
Liveable Places
butterpaper
Australian Transport
       Discussion Board

Urban Design Forum
Urban Residue
SkyscraperCity
Environmental News
Metropolitan Transport
       Forum

Media

Metropolis (USA)
The Next American
       City (USA)

Planning Online (UK)
Doors of Perception
Arts and Letters Daily
The Age
The Australian
New York Times (USA)
Guardian (UK)

Study Resources

RMIT
RMIT Learning Hub
RMIT Library
CoolCat
QUT Planning Links

Government

Melbourne City Council
Melbourne 2030
Dept. Infrastructure
Dept. Sustainability and
       Environment

Dept. Transport and
       Regional Services

Local Government
Information Victoria
OECD